Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Adoption's Relationship to Money
Adoption's Relationship to Money Those who steal children from their mothers to adopt out each child in a concealed/closed adoption so ..."
Tracking Natural Mothers In Adoption
Tracking Natural Mothers In Adoption
Those who steal children from their mothers to adopt out each child in a concealed/closed adoption so their mothers cannot find them then solicit people--usually lawyers because they have the best access to private investigators and government agents like police officers--to track these mothers. Though they often describe their activities hence as monitoring the fact remains it all constitutes the same thing, tracking. Since adoption-rooted child-takers could include anyone it doesn't matter if they are social workers, lawyers, doctors, clergy leaders, etc. because many of these child thieves often follow up their gratuitously cruel actions, of adoption-based child abduction, by then engaging someone such as a well-connected lawyer to track the mothers whose child[ren] they seized for the purpose of adopting them out to get money.
This shows that a combination of people are responsible for shadowing natural mothers after their child[ren] is/are taken from them and adopted out in concealed adoption. Included among these as mentioned are social workers, lawyers, private investigators, government municipal police officers, and others all keeping track of any given natural mother relative to any adoption case.
Several actions are taken to trail any particular mother whose child[ren] was/were or are taken and adopted out away from her. Such tactics include using the mother's private information such as her date of birth and social security number. Then her account number(s) any place where she has an account of any kind--at the bank, utility companies, employer, government agencies, etc.--also are used to track her.
Falsely accusing and so criminalizing a natural mother provides her inquisitors with what they consider great justification to pursue her. Making her a criminal then means her mail which obviously could include that routed by the United States Postal Service (USPS) as well as that transmitted electronically may be seized, her telephone tapped, residence electronically wired/bugged, her money could be tracked, and her neighbors and others may be solicited to inform on her. All these ILLEGAL means constitute some of the other not only under-handed but also clandestine tactics used to shadow any given natural mother.
Usually it's in the beginning of the whole process of her child[ren] being taken and adopted out away from her when any given original mother starts being shadowed. Then the passage of time, that obviously is in keeping with her child[ren] growing up, perpetuates her continually being constantly tracked.
If she becomes a target of surveillance then she can be the focus anywhere. Such means that where ever she lives, her place of residence in her community, a natural mother can be kept track of pertaining to her whereabouts and activities.
A first mother is trailed, contrary to conventional thinking, not necessarily to obstruct her from doing or NOT doing anything. Instead an adoption child-loss mother is tracked more as a way to stop her adopted-out child[ren], whether or not they're searching, from finding her.
Those who steal children from their mothers to adopt out each child in a concealed/closed adoption so their mothers cannot find them then solicit people--usually lawyers because they have the best access to private investigators and government agents like police officers--to track these mothers. Though they often describe their activities hence as monitoring the fact remains it all constitutes the same thing, tracking. Since adoption-rooted child-takers could include anyone it doesn't matter if they are social workers, lawyers, doctors, clergy leaders, etc. because many of these child thieves often follow up their gratuitously cruel actions, of adoption-based child abduction, by then engaging someone such as a well-connected lawyer to track the mothers whose child[ren] they seized for the purpose of adopting them out to get money.
This shows that a combination of people are responsible for shadowing natural mothers after their child[ren] is/are taken from them and adopted out in concealed adoption. Included among these as mentioned are social workers, lawyers, private investigators, government municipal police officers, and others all keeping track of any given natural mother relative to any adoption case.
Several actions are taken to trail any particular mother whose child[ren] was/were or are taken and adopted out away from her. Such tactics include using the mother's private information such as her date of birth and social security number. Then her account number(s) any place where she has an account of any kind--at the bank, utility companies, employer, government agencies, etc.--also are used to track her.
Falsely accusing and so criminalizing a natural mother provides her inquisitors with what they consider great justification to pursue her. Making her a criminal then means her mail which obviously could include that routed by the United States Postal Service (USPS) as well as that transmitted electronically may be seized, her telephone tapped, residence electronically wired/bugged, her money could be tracked, and her neighbors and others may be solicited to inform on her. All these ILLEGAL means constitute some of the other not only under-handed but also clandestine tactics used to shadow any given natural mother.
Usually it's in the beginning of the whole process of her child[ren] being taken and adopted out away from her when any given original mother starts being shadowed. Then the passage of time, that obviously is in keeping with her child[ren] growing up, perpetuates her continually being constantly tracked.
If she becomes a target of surveillance then she can be the focus anywhere. Such means that where ever she lives, her place of residence in her community, a natural mother can be kept track of pertaining to her whereabouts and activities.
A first mother is trailed, contrary to conventional thinking, not necessarily to obstruct her from doing or NOT doing anything. Instead an adoption child-loss mother is tracked more as a way to stop her adopted-out child[ren], whether or not they're searching, from finding her.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Adoption's Money
The relationship between money and adoption especially when it comes to those who dissent in adoption commerce indeed does exist. Let's briefly define the relationship of adoption MONEY to adoption DISSENT. Adoption's money is exchanged with cash between the different parties to any given adoption in either selling or buying mostly these related services. Selling such services includes everything from investigator costs, lawyer's fees, finder's fees, adoption loans, retail products and other similar services. Similarly is money generated from buying adoption-related services and products. These are pretty much the same as those aforementioned.
Examine this evidentiary-type information. For it will reveal the conclusive evidence that explains the one-sidedness of those who transact adoptions and so support adoption but even more will reveal why those who dissent relative to adoption are silenced.
Here's what I mean specifically. Pro-adoption people--mostly who include lawyers since usually they are the folks who have the most to gain because they directly transact adoptions but also included here is social workers--don't want to lose their adoption-related money they get from various fees and other costs. So, they one-sidedly promote adoption.
Promoting adoption as they do means they create a one-sided situation. This the lawyers and other pro-adoption people do by silencing those who dissent. In other words people who protest adoption, regardless of their reason[s], are silenced.
On the other hand as I've mentioned supporters of adoption promote it very one-sided. They always make adoption seem eutopic.
With no one questioning the whole process this keeps the money coming in, for the lawyers etc. This way they don't lose their adoption-related money.
Examine this evidentiary-type information. For it will reveal the conclusive evidence that explains the one-sidedness of those who transact adoptions and so support adoption but even more will reveal why those who dissent relative to adoption are silenced.
Here's what I mean specifically. Pro-adoption people--mostly who include lawyers since usually they are the folks who have the most to gain because they directly transact adoptions but also included here is social workers--don't want to lose their adoption-related money they get from various fees and other costs. So, they one-sidedly promote adoption.
Promoting adoption as they do means they create a one-sided situation. This the lawyers and other pro-adoption people do by silencing those who dissent. In other words people who protest adoption, regardless of their reason[s], are silenced.
On the other hand as I've mentioned supporters of adoption promote it very one-sided. They always make adoption seem eutopic.
With no one questioning the whole process this keeps the money coming in, for the lawyers etc. This way they don't lose their adoption-related money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)